Like the onion but more fashionable.

Jonathan Anderson supporters have confirmed a peaceful transfer of power at Loewe, welcoming Proenza Schouler as the new leadership. “While we weren’t able to exercise our right to vote, we trust LVMH acted in the best interest of the house and its global community.”

Loewe Supporters Vow Peaceful Transfer of Power, Welcome Proenza Schouler

Following the official announcement of Proenza Schouler’s appointment as creative directors of Loewe, supporters of outgoing designer Jonathan Anderson have formally acknowledged the peaceful transition of power and expressed their full support for the incoming leadership.

“While we were not able to exercise our right to vote, we remain confident that LVMH has acted in the best interest of the house and its global community,” read a joint statement circulated on key fashion social media accounts. “We thank Mr. Anderson for his decade of extraordinary service, and we look forward to the future with clarity, respect, and cautious optimism.”

Though the structure of power remains oligarchic—concentrated within the executive corridors of LVMH—the process was carried out with the ceremonial dignity of a monarchy and received by the fashion public as a kind of aesthetic parliament.

The transition itself was seamless. No backlash campaigns. No stylist resignations. No anonymous callouts. The community maintained order. The archives were left undisturbed.

A Private Ceremony Marks the Formal Handover of Power

Sources close to the house confirmed that a private ceremonial handover took place inside the Loewe studio. Key creative codes—both literal and emotional—were entrusted to Jack McCollough and Lazaro Hernandez, who accepted the role with quiet composure. Anderson departed without fanfare, leaving behind a body of work that will be studied, referenced, and reissued for decades.

Proenza Schouler has issued no lengthy statement, but insiders describe their incoming vision as one of “structural continuity and directional restraint,” signaling a tonal shift away from surrealist maximalism toward controlled, cerebral elegance.

Supporters of Anderson, long admired for their deep attachment to his fringe-era legacy, responded not with panic, but with poise. “This is the rarest kind of moment in fashion,” said one editor. “One where the public is not consulted, but still somehow agrees.”

The industry, still healing from prior regime collapses, has cautiously embraced the stability. No one expects transparency—but everyone seems grateful for order.

For now, the oligarchy holds. The house endures. And the people of fashion—silenced, perhaps, but stylish—await what comes next.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *